All group and organization hould function a team in which everyone make deciion and hare reponibilitie and dutie. Giving one peron central authority and reponibility for a project or tak i not an effective way to get work done。 To what extent do you agree or diagree with the opinion expreed above? Support your view with reaon and/or pecific example drawn from your own work or chool experience, your obervation, or your reading。
Some people argue that it i not an effective way to give one peron central authority and reponibility to get work done. Rather, all group and organization hould function a team where everyone make deciion and hare reponibilitie. Although it i true that doing thing in team-baed environment create a cooperation pirit which i a powerful motivator for the worker of the company, I till believe that there hould be omeone who make deciion and hare dutie。
Firt, a group cannot make deciion. Everyone in a group can bring out uggetion, pro and con, but only one peron can make the final deciion and bear the major reponibility for a project or tak. Thi bring my econd point that reponibility ha to be peronal to mean omething. Group reponibility mean nothing. Another point i that a required tep in any large project i to pide the project into maller part and to aign them to the team member. Naturally, only a chief peron can do that。[由www.hAozuowEn.com整理]