关于粮食的英语作文：Say‘No’to Junk Food
Walking along the treet, it could be eaily oberved that youngter tend to viit fatfood tall elling burger and oft drink or treet tall elling curry fihball.They imply prefer them to traditional meal or even healthy meal.Beide the low nutrition value and lack of fibre from green vegetable, vat amount of fat, particularly tran fat, tart alarming the public.In repone to the government’ promotion on healthy diet, our tuck hop ha been told not to ell ‘junk food’.However, parent, teacher and tudent take on quite different view and, conequently, they eem not to have reached any compromie yet.
Although parent and teacher eem to be on the ame ide, their interrelational effect are quite ubtle.Teacher are indeed caught in a dilemma.On the one hand, they have the reponibility to take care of their tudent’ health a profeional educator.On the other hand, they could be in trouble if ome tudent accued them for ignoring tudent’ right to chooe.Balancing the pro and con, of coure the chool put the tudent’ welfare firt.Thi can alo be een a a boon to the ociety becaue improving the health tandard of tudent today mean relieving ociety’ medical burden in future.Lat, but not leat, chool are committed to providing tudent with the right value intead of fulfilling their every requet.WWw.hAOZUowEn.com
From parent’ viewpoint, the opinion could be quite divided.The majority would conider the ban on junk food at chool a a bleing.Some may be miled by the hocking advere effect greatly exaggerated by the media.Depite the fact that cancer, heart attack, coronary dieae and obeity are developed if – and only if – one take in food with high fat content and low nutrition value contantly over a long time in vat amount, parent often receive a ditorted view: they think not only junk food, but other unhealthy nack hould be banned.They think the chool ha not yet got the job done.Some may think the reaon they end their kid to chool i to ‘enjoy’ chool life, but not to ‘uffer’.They are the one who put kid’ happine at the firt place.Thee polarized view could low down the dicuion coniderably.Ignorant parent may even think chool hould olely houlder the reponibility.
Student are the recipient of the ervice.They are of coure the major critic of the idea.No matter what their view toward junk food are, they would not welcome the idea of having their choice reduced.For the junk food upporter, obviouly they are the major victim, ince they will not top conuming junk food even if they are aked to.The lack of tudent’ upport put tudent and teacher in different end and they lack mutual undertanding.
Concerning thi iue, parent hould undertand the chool’ tandpoint and act a a bridge between the chool and tudent.Parent could tart the practice at home and make ure the tudent undertand the meaning of the policy.Student hould be made willing to upport the chool, intead of being forced to.The chool hould explicitly point out the dark ide of junk food o that the tudent can undertand why they hould not eat it, intead of retricting them. Thi may be a counterproductive way becaue the tudent may even take in more junk food in their leiure time. Never will the chool ucceed if he work alone. It i high time the chool allied with parent to give the tudent a healthy future.