In ome countrie people are no longer allowed to moke in many public place and office building. Do you think thi i a good rule or a bad rule? Ue pecific reaon and detail to upport your poition.
Not allowing moking in public place and office building i a very good rule. I believe thi for everal reaon .Not only will banning moking improve people’ health, it will alo increae worker productivity and reduce conflict.
we all know moking i not healthy. Unfortunately, when moker are able to moke in public building, they can make other people ick . They may work with people who are allergic to moking, for example. In that cae , the non-moker have no choice unle they want to quit their job. They can only get icker , which i unfair .Of coure , banning moking in public building and office will pleae non-moker. It will alo improve the moker’ health. They will have fewer opportunitie to moke, o they will moke fewer cigarette.
Banning moking in office building can alo increae worker productivity. Smoker won’t interrupt their work all the time to moke. There will alo be fewer worker abence. When moker cut down the number of cigarette, they will get fewer moking related illnee.
Finally, it i a good idea to ban moking in public place and office building becaue a ban can reduce conflict. Non-moker tend to get annoyed and jealou becaue moker have an excue to take frequent break .The mot ignificant conflict, however, i over whether moker have a right to moke in public . A we have already een, non-moker feel they are not alway given a choice. If moking in public i allowed , they will be forced to breathe harmful air. Thi may violate their right, and non-moker are angry with moker becaue of it.由好作网www.hAOzuowEn.com整理
It eem clear that banning moking n public place and office building i a good idea. It will reduce conflict and increae productivity. It will alo benefit health of moker and non-moker alike. I believe that jut about anything that improve our health i a good idea!