Such nonmaintream area of inquiry a atrology， fortune-telling， and pychic and paranormal puruit play a vital role in ociety by atifying human need that are not addreed by maintream cience.
这个题目是讲主流和非主流的关系，提的方面是科学领域内。但是这个题目里面我自认为的一个问题是，peaker把atrology，fortune-telling，pychic，和paranormal puruit也归结为科学的范畴内了，但这些都是我们通常成为的伪科学的几个典型方面。
这个题目，目前我没有想到什么好的方面来支持这个peaker的正确性。希望有持支持观点的朋友来说说你自己的看法伪科学的相关释义附在点评最后处
Thi tatement actually conit of two claim: that non-maintream area of inquiry are vital in atifying human need， and that thee area are therefore vital to ociety. I concede that atrology， fortune- telling， and pychic and paranormal puruit repond to certain baic human need.
干净利索的分析了题目，但是个人认为还不是分析的很透彻。
However， in my view the potential harm they can inflict on their participant and on ociety far outweigh their pychological benefit.
自己观点出来了，反对。是一个让步的关系，先承认了是有此方面的作用，用了however来了个转折给从更大的方面给否了。WWw.hAOZUowEN.com