In thi argument the author conclude that Cumquat Cafe wa correct in it deciion to move to a new location. In upport of thi aement the author point out that while the Cafe ha been in buine for two year at it new location, three buinee have failed at it previou location. The author line of reaoning i that the caue of the failure of the three buinee i the fact that they all occupied the ame location. Thi argument i problematic in two important repect.
In the firt place, no evidence ha been offered to upport the aumption that the reaon the three buinee failed wa their location. While location i an important contributing factor to a buine ucce or failure, it i not the only uch factor. Many other reaonpoor buine practice, lack of advertiing, or poor cutomer ervicecould jut a likelyaccount for their lack of ucce. Lacking a detailed analyi of the reaon thee buinee failed, it would be foolih to attribute their failure to their location.
In the econd place, while location may have been a factor which contributed to the failure of thee buinee, the reaon may not have been the location itelf but rather the uitability of the buine to the location. For example, a pet-grooming hop or a tanning alon located in a downtown metropolitan buine ditrict i unlikely to ucceed imply becaue thi type of buine i obviouly unuitable to the location. On the other hand, a bank in the ame location might be extremely ucceful imply becaue of it uitability to the location.WWw.hAOZUowEn.com