Englih or Chinee
Scene I， I elect a coure of Wetern Economic。 I open my textbook。 It' a work of a famou American economit， written in Englih。 My teacher i peaking in a high mood， alo in Englih。
Scene II， I elect a leon of Chinee literature。 I open my textbook only to find all the famou people of China labeled with their name in letter。 Furthermore， there i not a ingle Chinee character in the book and my teacher i reciting a poem of Tang Dynaty in Englih。
Now， given the quetion "Do you agree that in Chinee higher education， textbook hould be written in Englih and the language ued in cla hould alo be Englih?" Can you anwer it jut by "ye" or "no" imply?
A i known to all， Englih i gaining an increaingly important poition in today' China。 Even kid in kindergarten have begun to learn imple word。 That' a good phenomenon， for Englih i eential nowaday。 A we college tudent are concerned， one benefit of learning thi language i that we can read the original work directly。 Thi i becaue even the mot excellent tranlator i no more than a peron， who can never totally a void adding hi own opinion to the original。 Therefore， the Chinee verion we read uually differ from the original one， and in ome cae the two verion are even oppoite in meaning。Learning Englih provide u with a poible tool to olve thi problem a we mater the writer' language， we can explore hi thought on our own。[由www.haoZuowen.Com整理]
Then， can we jut ay "ye" to the quetion given above?Jut imagine the econd cene at the beginning， will you agree to replace all our book with their Englih verion? That' more than a joke。
Englih doe help u read Englih original work， but Chinee help u learn a true China。 Chinee character are an ineparable part of Chinee culture。 Only by character can Chinee literature end off it brilliance。 Some modern tranlator have tried to tranlate claical Chinee literature into Englih。 I wa unlucky enough to have heard a o called "poem" of Li Bai。 I till doubt even now whether it i a poem of Li or jut a proe created by the tranlator himelf。 I want to cry， for Li Bai， for Chinee literature and alo for the ignorant "tranlator"。 Maybe， he jut wanted to introduce Chinee culture to the whole world， but what he ha done i jut killing it。 To learn a country' culture，epecially it claical culture， the firt thing i to learn it language。 Opinion through tranlator ometime can be helpful，but ometime， they can be fatally mileading。 Since we are Chinee， why do we give up our mother tongue and learn our own culture through a foreign language? If o， everal year later，not only the foreigner but we ourelve will be unable to undertand our culture。 By that day， Chinee culture will die， China will die， and we will jut be a group of "foreigner" with dark eye and yellow kin。
By now， I think I have found the anwer to the quetion。We had better ue the Englih original work when we learn coure like wetern economic and wetern philoophy。 A for the Chinee culture or the Chinee hitory， we hould tick to our own language。
简 评
当前，英语热在中国各大高校有愈演愈烈之势，极端者甚至提出大学课程应当全部用英语教授。对此王昕同学分析了中英文各自不可替代的作用，并指出：中文作为中国传统文化的精髓，中华民族的生存之本，是不容忽视的。
文章构思新颖，立意不凡。开篇先用写剧本的手法描写了两幕场景：用英语教授的西方经济学课和同样用英语教授的中国文学课，令读者眼前一亮，引起了强烈的阅读欲望，随之自然引出中心议题。本文的议论也相当流畅，采用分层论证的方式，分别用问句导出中英文各自的作用，再举例证明，或逻辑推理，最后水到渠成地得出结论。
不足之处在于，上半部分论证翻译的作用时，有几句体现出作者思维不够连贯，可以加一连接词承接。此外，论述过程当中句型若能增加些变化，则文章会更生动可读。