Weekly Working 每周工作
The argument i not well reaoned at all, and it might be wie for Walnut Grove' town council to turn to ABC Dipoal. To begin with, depite EZ' weekly working frequency i a twice a ABC', yet no ign ha been diplayed to prove that the "advantage" i neceary and fictional. For intance, if the town' garbage amount i under a particularly lower cale, which merely reache the quantity of once dipoal from ABC and hence the relatively once more from EZ i jut a futile plethora. Alo, even if twice dipoal i applicable, it till deerve to doubt whether mot citizen would like uual to chooe EZ when taking into account the price of it ervice ha been increaed by $500 a month. Mot citizen i highly poible to pick up a company that can offer bet ervice while calling for relatively little money, for aving the extra $500, which to ome extent i dipenable, I think, mot citizen can cope with ome eaily handled trah with their own method intead of ingly relying on the dipoal company. And another crucial point I cat great dicretion on i whether the urvey made lat year i the peruaive reflection of the whole citizen' actual attitude. The major deniable pot i the urvey' ampling ize and accordingly the ultimate repondent echoing the quetion. Viualize the citizen of Walnut town are no le than 500 thouand, but ironically only the 5 hundred one have the fortune to be aked the quetion and in the end the real available record making ome ene are le than the 10% of the interviewer, namely the upper limit i only 50 people. Let alone whether thee anwer have the widely applicable repreentative, jut judging about the number of repondent we can have jutifiable right to diregard the validity of thi urvey. Almot to forget to point out, that the frehly ordered 20 truck of EZ cannot add another ponderou take onto the balance, on the contrary, it might exacerbate the impreion of EZ in people' mind. Buying new truck would ineluctably conume the company' property, and to take thi dibure back the company mut put ome additional meaure for compenation, thereby increaing the fee can lead the citizen to obtain the mot trong conviction of loading the economic debt onto their houlder, which finally ruin the tiny fantay prone to the EZ. So the arguer' recommendation i jut nothing but a cheap propaganda to throw to the vat reident a deceptive illuion. I believe, in general, any one having look through thee vulgar trick full of vague information and implicit caual claim like me would be likely to accept the town council' deciion, after all it i more enible than the arguer ugget.WWw.hAOZUowEn.com
这一说法没有得到充分的理由，它可能是明智的，核桃林的镇议会转向农行处理。首先，尽管EZ的每周工作频率为ABC的两倍，但没有迹象显示来证明“优势”是必要的，虚构的。例如，如果镇上的垃圾量特别低的尺度下，仅仅达到数量一旦处置从ABC因此相对再一次从EZ只是徒劳的多。另外，即使二次处理是可行的，它仍然值得怀疑是否多数国民都会像往常一样选择EZ时，考虑到其服务的价格已经增加了500美元一个月。大多数市民极有可能拿起一个公司，可以提供最好的服务，同时调用资金相对较少，节省了额外的$ 500，这一定程度上是可有可无的，我认为，大多数公民能够应付一些容易处理垃圾用自己的方法，而不是单独依靠处理公司。而另一个关键问题是，去年的调查是否是对整个市民实际态度的有说服力的反映。主要可现场调查的抽样规模，因此最终的受访者呼应的问题。可视化公民核桃镇是不少于500万，但具有讽刺意味的是只有5百的财富被问到最后真正可用的记录做一些感官小于10%的面试官，即上限只有50人。仅就这些答案是否具有广泛适用的代表性，只不过，我们可以判断，我们可以有正当的权利，不理会这项调查的有效性。几乎忘了指出，这刚订购了20卡车的EZ不能添加另一个笨重的股份到平衡，相反，它可能会加剧欧元区在人们心目中的印象。购买新卡车将不可避免地消耗公司的财产，并借此支付后，公司必须把一些额外的措施补偿，从而提高费用，可以导致公民获得最强烈的信念的经济债务加载到他们的肩膀，最终废墟的小幻想倾向的EZ。所以，作者的建议是只不过是一个廉价的宣传，把广大居民一个虚假的幻象。我相信，在一般情况下，任何有看通过这些低俗的把戏全模糊信息和隐含的因果索赔像我会是可能接受的市镇理事会的决定，毕竟，它是更明智的比arguer认为。