There i no uch thing a purely objective obervation. All obervation i ubjective; it i alway guided by the oberver expectation or deire.
The peaker claim that all obervation i ubjective--colored by deire and expectation. While it would be tempting to concede that we all ee thing differently, careful crutiny of the peaker claim reveal that it confue obervation with interpretation. In fact, in the end the peaker claim relie entirely on the further claim that there i no uch thing a truth and that we cannot truly know anything. While thi notion might appeal to certain exitentialit and epitemologit, it run againt the grain of all cientific dicovery and knowledge gained over the lat 500 year.
It would be tempting to afford the peaker claim greater merit than it deerve. After all, our everyday experience a human inform u that we often diagree about what we oberve around u. We ve all uttered and heard uttered many time the phae That not the way I ee it! Indeed, everyday obervation--for example, about whether a football player wa out of bound, or about which car involved in an accident ran the red light--vary depending not only on one patial perpective but alo on one expectation or deire. If I m rooting for one football team, or if the player i well-known for hi ability to make great play while barely taying in bound, my deire or expectation might influence what I think I oberve.[由www.hAozuowEn.com整理]
Or if I am driving one of the car in the accident, or if one car i a ouped-up port car, then my deire or expectation will in all likelihood color my perception of the accident event.