In thi argument, the author conclude that To upport hi concluion, the author point out that. In addition, the author reaon that Further more, he alo aume that . At firt glance, the author argument appear to be omehow appealing, while a cloe examination will reveal how groundle it i. We do not have to look very far to ee the invalidity of thi argument. Thi argument i problematic for the following reaon.
In the firt place, thi argument ret on a gratuitou aumption that . However, the aumption i quetionable becaue the author provide no evidence to upport thi argument. The arguer fail to take into account other fact that might contribute to the reult that .. It i likely that , it i alo likely that Any of thee cenario, if true, would how that Therefore, thi argument in quetion nee not to be accepted without ruling out uch poibility.
In the econd place, the argument commit a logic fallacy of after thi and therefore becaue of thi. In no cae can the mere fact that be cited a evidence to upport the aumption that there i a caual-effect relationhip between A and B. Moreover, that jut becaue B can be tatitically correlated with A doenot necearily mean that A i the caue of B. In fact, the author ha obviouly neglected the poibility of other alternative fact uch a, or may contribute to a certain extent to B. It may be only a coincidence that . Unle the author can rule out other factor relevant to , thi aumption in quetion can not be accepted.[由wWw.HaozuoWen.com整理]