In thi argument, the author conclude that To upport hi concluion, the author point out that. In addition, the author reaon that Further more, he alo aume that . At firt glance, the author argument appear to be omehow appealing, while a cloe examination will reveal how groundle it i. We do not have to look very far to ee the invalidity of thi argument. Thi argument i problematic for the following reaon.
In the firt place, thi argument ret on a gratuitou aumption that .The author unfairly aume that. However, the aumption i quetionable becaue the author provide no evidence to upport thi argument. The arguer fail to take into account other fact that might contribute to the reult that It i likely that , it i alo likely that Any of thee cenario, if true, would how that Therefore, thi argument i unwarranted without ruling out uch poibility.
In the econd place, the argument commit a logic fallacy of after thi and therefore becaue of thi. In no cae can the mere fact that be cited a evidence to upport the aumption that there i a caual-effect relationhip between A and B. Moreover, that jut becaue B can be tatitically correlated with A doe not necearily mean that A i the caue of B. In fact, the author ha obviouly neglected the poibility of other alternative fact uch a, or may contribute to a certain extent to B. It may be only a coincidence that . Unle the author can rule out other factor relevant to , thi aumption in quetion can not be accepted.[由wWw.HaozuoWen.com整理]