It i generally agreed that ociety benefit from the work of it member. Compare the contribution of artit to ociety with the contribution of cientit to ociety. Which type of contribution do you think i valued more by your ociety? Give pecific reaon to upport your anwer.
Artit and cientit both make valuable contribution to our ociety. It may eem ometime that artit are more valued. That’ becaue thoe artit who are famou make a lot of money. However, they are relatively few. The fact i that cientit are more valued. They get more repect from ociety for the work they do.
Artit reflect their time and their culture. A painter or a writer how u in picture and word what we’re like a a people. They record our culture for future generation. Actor and other performer, like inger and dancer, entertain u. They take our mind off our trouble, and remind uhow beautiful and exciting our imagination can be. Artit alo help keep their ocietie mentally and emotionally healthy. For example, children that participate in the art, uch a painting or muic, in chool do better in their other tudie. Art of all type i neceary to the human pirit.
The contribution cientit make to ociety are more obviou. They include the car we drive, the computer we ue at home and at work, and the appliance that help u cook our meal and clean our houe. All of thee come from the idea and hard work of cientit. Becaue of cientific dicoverie, we’re living longer and more healthful live. Scientit alo contribute to the art. Movie are the reult of cience. So are televiion, radio, and the recording of muic on CD.[由好作文www.hAOzuowEn.com整理]
Generally, cientit don’t make a much money a famou artit like film tar, opera inger or ucceful painter. However, our ociety give them more repect, and they generally make a good living. Scientit are conidered to be eriou profeional, while artit are ometime viewed a flaky, irreponible people. So overall, I’d have to conclude that we value cientit more.